Science
I think it's really important to fund studies to be redone. Easily half of Scientific funding, which I'm guessing because new studies probably take more resources because they have to be made from scratch, would be like 80% of studies, I think I would devote to redoing previous studies. Humanity has been around for a while. We'll figure out the complicated stuff later. Many of our scientific mistakes have happened when we were under the wrong assumptions. We can break those assumptions and build our science like the pyramids, with firm foundations. I think in an era where truth is questioned, having an authority, science, that is more dedicated to confirming it's own truths is important to keep us moving forward and keep our debates about the proper questions (not about things that are already settled). There should be an Agency for the Criticism, Improvement, and Confirmation of Scientific Studies aka ACICSS pronounced "A"-sicks, lol. Basically, you ta...